HA
VC Math
by Huntington Analytics
// FEEDBACK   Found a math error, broken UI, or want a feature? Open an issue and we'll fold it into the next deploy.
// HUNTINGTON ANALYTICS / VC MATH

Why does a VC need your startup to exit for half a billion?

One reason startups struggle to raise money is they don't understand the investor's math. This tool turns every input from a VC fund's math โ€” fund size, fee, IRR, ownership target, round dilution, exit value โ€” into a knob you can turn. Tweak any number and watch the chain reaction.

$30M fund example 2/20 fee structure 10% target IRR 15% ownership at exit
Step 1

Fund math โ€” how big an exit does the VC need?

Set the fund's size, fees, target return, and ownership goal. The tool back-solves the total exit value the VC must generate from its winners.

Inputs
Portfolio construction
Outputs
Mgmt fees taken
โ€”
โ€”
Deployable capital
โ€”
After fees
Required return
โ€”
โ€”
Required total exit value across winners
โ€”
โ€” so the VC can hit IRR if they own the target % at exit.
Portfolio check
Initial deployedโ€”
Follow-on deployedโ€”
Total deployedโ€”
vs. deployableโ€”
Per-winner math (if only 1 of N exits big)
If VCs assume all but ONE investment fails, a single winner has to exit for:
โ€”
Across initial portfolio of N companies. Adjust the # of expected winners below.
Show the formulas
mgmt_fees = fund ร— (fee1 ร— 5 + fee2 ร— 5) / 100
deployable = fund โˆ’ mgmt_fees
required_return = fund ร— (1 + IRR/100)^term
required_total_exit = required_return / (target_ownership / 100)
Pre-money back-solver (founder view)
Reverse the math

You know what you want to raise and how much dilution you'll accept. Solve for the pre-money valuation you need.

Required pre-money
โ€”
Post-money
โ€”
Price per share (1M shares)
โ€”
Formulas
post = raise / (target_dilution + pool_refresh)
pre = post โˆ’ raise โˆ’ (pool_refresh ร— post)
Step 2

Cap table โ€” what dilution looks like, round by round

Edit any cell. The VC's stake compounds with each round they invest in, and shrinks each round they sit out. The founder shrinks every round.

Editable rounds
Round Pre-money ($M) Raise ($M) Post-money Equity sold VC invests ($M) VC equity (cumul.) Founder (cumul.)
How VC dilution works
Each round, every existing holder is diluted by the % of new equity sold. If the VC writes another check, they add fresh equity on top.
Why VCs need ~15% at exit
A 25% seed stake becomes ~18% by Series C even if the VC follows on once. Skip rounds and it shrinks fast.
Founder math
Starting at 30% (after co-founders + ESOP), the founder ends at ~8% after 4 rounds. The exit needs to be big.
Final cap table (after all rounds)
Exit payouts at final ownership
VC gets
โ€”
Founder gets
โ€”

Note: this ignores liquidation preferences and option pool refreshes for simplicity.

Round-by-round dilution chart
Step 3

Exit waterfall โ€” who gets paid, and in what order

The exit price isn't the VC's profit. Capital comes off the top, then carry, then partners split. This is how an $90M VC payout turns into a $4M check per partner.

Inputs
Distribution
VC gross take
โ€”
โ€”
Capital returned to LPs
โ€”
First call: fund's committed $
Profit pool
โ€”
After capital return
Carry to GP firm
โ€”
profit ร— carry%
Each partner gets
โ€”
carry รท # partners
Net to LP investors
โ€”
profit ร— (1โˆ’carry%) + capital
Show the formulas
gross = exit ร— ownership%
profit_pool = gross โˆ’ committed_capital
carry = profit_pool ร— carry%
per_partner = carry / # partners
lp_net = profit_pool ร— (1 โˆ’ carry%) + committed_capital
Step 4

Entrepreneur's time value of money

Every dollar raised has a clock on it. This shows how much you have to spend per second to extend runway.

Inputs

"Post-money" framing matches the gener8tor slide ($0.16/sec for $10M post / 24mo). "Raise" gives true cash burn.

Burn rate (calendar time)
$/Month
โ€”
$/Week
โ€”
$/Day
โ€”
$/Hour
โ€”
$/Minute
โ€”
$/Second
โ€”
Moral of the story
Don't split hairs on valuation. A $40M post vs $10M post is the difference between $0.16/sec and $0.63/sec of fuel for the same 24 months โ€” way more leverage than haggling on a few % of dilution.
Step 5

Unit economics โ€” what makes you investable

The deck's "CAC ร— 3 < LTV" and "payback < 12 months" rules, plus the famous SaaS cash flow trough that explains why fast growth burns cash before it makes cash.

LTV / CAC / Payback calculator
Deck pages 65โ€“66
โ€”
LTV
โ€”
LTV / CAC
โ€”
Target โ‰ฅ 3
Payback months
โ€”
Target โ‰ค 12
Avg customer life
โ€”
= 1 / churn
Formulas
LTV = (ARPU ร— gross_margin) / monthly_churn
payback_months = CAC / (ARPU ร— gross_margin)
verdict = LTV/CAC โ‰ฅ 3 AND payback โ‰ค 12 โ†’ green
Single-deal cash flow
Deck pages 61โ€“62

One customer at a time: you pay CAC up front, then earn a contribution margin every month they stick around. The bar dips in month 1 and slowly recovers.

Break-even month
โ€”
Profit by month N
โ€”
Months to pay back CAC
โ€”
The SaaS cash flow trough
Deck pages 63โ€“64

Now multiply by lots of customers acquired every month. Cumulative cash goes deep negative โ€” that's the trough. Faster growth = deeper trough = bigger payoff later. This is why startups raise money.

Scenario A
โ€”
Scenario B
โ€”
Scenario C
โ€”
Quarter โ†’ Dollar (the offer to investors)
Deck pages 67โ€“70

Pulled directly from the deck: "I promise to give you a dollar in 12 monthsโ€ฆ IF you give me a quarter today." A 4ร— return per bet โ€” but most bets fail. Move the survival slider to see how the math holds up.

Multiple per bet
โ€”
Effective multiple (after survival)
โ€”
Profitable?
โ€”

Grid shows 36 bets. Green = paid out, gray = failed. The deck's lesson: even at 4ร— per win, you need most bets to survive.

Step 6

Growth โ€” why investors are obsessed with MoM rate

$1,000 of revenue compounding at 20% month-over-month for 84 months becomes $3.7 billion. This is the single most important slide in the deck.

Inputs
Overlay deck benchmarks
Final valueโ€”
At 12moโ€”
At 36moโ€”
At 60moโ€”
Compounding curve (log scale)

Log scale because at 20% MoM the linear chart is unreadable after month 36 โ€” the entire history disappears against the spike at the end.

Step 7

Investability checklist โ€” what stage are you?

The deck's 4-stage gate. Each level unlocks a different kind of investor. Most founders pitching a Series A are still operating at Stage 2.

Your current stage
โ€”
Suggested round
โ€”
โ€”
SAFE math

SAFE / convertible note โ€” how the angel's check turns into shares

A SAFE converts at the next priced round using whichever mechanic โ€” valuation cap or discount โ€” gives the investor more shares. Set the SAFE terms and the priced round, and watch which mechanic wins.

Inputs
Next priced round
Conversion
Winning mechanic
โ€”
โ€”
Conversion price / share
โ€”
SAFE holder's effective PPS
Shares issued
โ€”
to the SAFE holder
SAFE % of post-money cap table
โ€”
Effective valuation SAFE converted at
โ€”
principal รท SAFE %
All three mechanics side-by-side
MechanicPrice / shareShares
A โ€” Priced round price (no cap, no discount)โ€”โ€”
B โ€” Discount onlyโ€”โ€”
C โ€” Valuation capโ€”โ€”
More shares = better for the SAFE holder. The winner gets a green row.
Show the formulas
// Convention: 1,000,000 fully-diluted shares pre-round (simplification)
price_priced = pre_money / 1,000,000
shares_A = principal / price_priced
shares_B = principal / (price_priced ร— (1 โˆ’ discount%))
shares_C = principal / (cap / 1,000,000)
winner = max(shares_B, shares_C) โ€” whichever gives the investor more shares
safe_% = shares_winner / (1,000,000 + new_round_shares + shares_winner)
Bonus

Liquidation preference โ€” how VCs guarantee their money back

VCs get paid before founders at exit. A 1x non-participating pref is a floor; participating preferred lets the VC "double dip." Watch where the kink in the payout curve falls โ€” that's where the VC "converts" to common.

Inputs
Exit value range
Payout curves

Violet = VC payout with pref. Red = founders + employees (everyone non-preferred). Gray dashed = what VC would get with pro-rata only (no pref). The gap between violet and gray shows the protection the pref provides.

Scenario table
ExitVC payoutVC multipleFounders + employees
Show the formulas
pref = money_in ร— pref_mult
non_part: vc = max(pref, exit ร— ownership%)
part_unc: vc = pref + (exit โˆ’ pref) ร— ownership%
part_cap: vc = min(part_unc_result, money_in ร— cap_mult)
common_pool = exit โˆ’ vc (split pro-rata by remaining ownership)
Capital sources

Pick your financing โ€” equity isn't the only option

The deck lists seven ways to fund a startup. Answer six toggles and the tool ranks which sources actually fit your situation.

Your situation
Best fits
Top recommendation
โ€”
โ€”
SourceExampleProsConsFit
Score 0โ€“3 per source. Bar turns green at 2+, amber at 1, gray below.
Recap

The full story in one chain

How each step compounds: from a $30M fund all the way to one partner's check.

    Why startups raise (despite all this dilution)
    Competitive landscape
    If a well-funded competitor exists, growing on cash flow alone means losing the market.
    Intellectual property
    Patents, R&D-heavy science, deep tech โ€” the bill comes due before revenue.
    CAC < LTV (SaaS/Subscription)
    If you can pay $X to acquire a customer worth $5X, every dollar raised is gasoline on a profitable fire.